Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:01:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:01:51 -0500 Received: from 5-106.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.163.106]:30652 "EHLO 5-106.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:01:50 -0500 Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 10:08:56 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Frederik Dannemare cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Limiting max cpu usage per user (old Conectiva patch) In-Reply-To: <3DE49A66.4020208@sentinel.dk> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 26 On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Frederik Dannemare wrote: > do we have an effective way to limit max cpu usage per user? I haven't been > able to find much useful info except for an old thread on lkml, where Rik > van Riel mentions[1] a 2.2 kernel patch by Conectiva. > > Anybody knows if this patch (or similar functionality) been ported to 2.4 > (or 2.5)? It's on my patches page: http://surriel.com/patches/ cheers, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: october@surriel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/