Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755618AbaGNODR (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:03:17 -0400 Received: from mail-qa0-f50.google.com ([209.85.216.50]:51970 "EHLO mail-qa0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755147AbaGNODF (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:03:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140714125836.GA6966@kroah.com> References: <1405278681-3348-1-git-send-email-peter.senna@gmail.com> <20140713193647.GA31010@kroah.com> <20140714085932.GA2958@hp-peter.rsr.lip6.fr> <20140714125836.GA6966@kroah.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:03:03 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] staging: vt6556: Cleanup coding style issues From: Peter Senna Tschudin To: Greg KH Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Malcolm Priestley , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Forest Bond Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 12:36:47PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:11:18PM +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote: >> > > This patch cleanup coding style issues reported by checkpatch. >> > > >> > > Tested by compilation only. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin >> > > --- >> > > Cahnges from V1: >> > > - Sent all patches in a series >> > >> > Why did you forget the other thing that I asked you to change? >> > >> > I can't take these as-is, sorry, please go back and re-read what I >> > wrote... >> >> Actually I was trying to do what you asked me on this E-mail: >> >> -- // -- >> You just sent me 4 patches, all with the same subject (but at least 2 of >> them had the order in which to apply them in, which is nice.) >> >> Please redo these such that they have a unique subject, and I can tell >> which order to apply them in, as I really have no idea about the second >> two. >> -- // -- >> >> I'm sending V3 as a single patch. > > That's going to get rejected as well :( > > You did put them in a nice order, but you had the same subject text for > each patch, which I told you not to do, right? > > {sigh} The noise was caused by my poor English language skills. When you wrote: "Please redo these such that they have a unique subject, and I can tell which order to apply them in, as I really have no idea about the second two." I understood: 1 - redo these patches 2 - such as they have a unique subject 3 - in a way Greg can tell in which order to apply them I just understood what you wanted today. Sorry for that. But, there is a plain text attachment on my previous E-mail with the V3 of the patch set. The V3 is a single patch instead of 4 patches, is that ok? Should I resend in a new thread? > > greg k-h -- Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/