Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755728AbaGNOS4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:18:56 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:45038 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754564AbaGNOSs (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:18:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] ftrace: Add dynamically allocated trampolines From: Namhyung Kim To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , Jiri Kosina , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E. McKenney" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Oleg Nesterov , Seth Jennings , Jiri Slaby In-Reply-To: <53C39250.20200@hitachi.com> References: <20140703200750.648550267@goodmis.org> <20140710213620.GA19858@treble.redhat.com> <53BF4B5A.3000302@hitachi.com> <20140711142928.GA13037@treble.redhat.com> <53C333D9.4030907@hitachi.com> <87ion02yx3.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> <53C39250.20200@hitachi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 23:18:41 +0900 Message-ID: <1405347521.1745.37.camel@leonhard> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2014-07-14 (월), 17:18 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu: > (2014/07/14 16:16), Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Hi Masami, > > > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:35:21 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > >> (2014/07/11 23:29), Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > >>> Here's the same stack trace with this patch: > >>> > >>> [ 1314.612287] [] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 > >>> [ 1314.612290] [] ? meminfo_proc_open+0x30/0x30 > >>> [ 1314.612293] [] kpatch_ftrace_handler+0x14/0xf0 [kpatch] > >>> [ 1314.612306] [] 0xffffffffa00160c3 > >> > >> Here, this still has a wrong entry. Maybe the trampline doesn't setup > >> frame pointer (bp) correctly. > > > > Hmm.. are you saying about the hex address above? I guess it's a valid > > entry in the (dynamic) trampoline, but has no symbol.. > > Ah, indeed. (BTW, why is it one less than the address ...? printk's spec?) Argh, it seems like a bug in printk's %pB format processing.. :-/ It subtract 1 from the address for stacktrace. Please see the commit 0f77a8d37825 ("vsprintf: Introduce %pB format specifier") and 71f9e59800e5 ("x86, dumpstack: Use %pB format specifier for stack trace") for details. But it should restore the original address when it failed to find a symbol for that address. I'll send a fix soon. Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/