Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:38:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:38:36 -0500 Received: from mail.heymax.com ([63.96.5.101]:58896 "EHLO heymax.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:38:24 -0500 From: "Jason Ford" To: "Byron Stanoszek" Cc: Subject: RE: aacraid 2.4.0 kernel Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 19:37:38 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 X-MDRemoteIP: 10.0.1.21 X-Return-Path: jason@heymax.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Byron, I got your patch to compile in fine however it still exhibits the same behavior that the older patches did. It looks like the commands sent to the controller are still not working correctly as the new subsystem in the kernel was rewritten. This is the error I get in my messages file when trying to copy from one disk partition to another one. Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 return code = 1 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: I/O error: dev 08:08, sector 657672 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: AacHba_`DoScsiWrite: WRITE request is larger than 64K Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: AacHba_DoScsiWrite: ByteCount: 69632 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: AacHba_DoScsiWrite: SG ELEMENTS: 16 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: Dump SG Element Size... Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 0: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 1: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 2: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 3: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 4: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 5: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 6: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 7: 8192 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 8: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 9: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 10: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 11: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 12: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 13: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 14: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: SG Segment 15: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:11 bass kernel: Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SCSI disk error : host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0 return code = 1 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: I/O error: dev 08:08, sector 665864 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: AacHba_`DoScsiWrite: WRITE request is larger than 64K Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: AacHba_DoScsiWrite: ByteCount: 69632 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: AacHba_DoScsiWrite: SG ELEMENTS: 16 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: Dump SG Element Size... Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 0: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 1: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 2: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 3: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 4: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 5: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 6: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 7: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 8: 8192 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 9: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 10: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 11: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 12: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 13: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 14: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: SG Segment 15: 4096 Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: Feb 7 19:32:12 bass kernel: so on and so on.. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks for your reply post.. Jason -----Original Message----- From: Byron Stanoszek [mailto:gandalf@winds.org] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2001 5:48 PM To: Jason Ford Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: aacraid 2.4.0 kernel On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Jason Ford wrote: > I see in the archives of this mailing list that someone was working on the > aacraid driver for the 2.4 kernel however that post was almost 2 months old. > I know Alan Cox denied inclusion of the driver due to the poor nature it was > written for the 2.2 tree. Every post that I have seen so far has just said > that Adaptec is working on it. However, I am sure there are many people out > there like myself that have to support this card in enviroments that would > be benifical to upgrade to 2.4 kernel. I am not a part of this list however > have been scouring through geocrawler.com archives of this list everyday for > the last month hoping and waiting. While it's totally unofficial, I have a patch for aacraid 1.0.6 for 2.4.1-ac5. I have not tested it yet, but it compiles cleanly. I'd like to hear any results (good or bad) you have on it. You can find it at: ftp://ftp.winds.org/linux/patches/2.4.1/aacraid-2.4.1-1.0.6.patch Regards, Byron -- Byron Stanoszek Ph: (330) 644-3059 Systems Programmer Fax: (330) 644-8110 Commercial Timesharing Inc. Email: byron@comtime.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/