Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 03:16:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 03:16:57 -0500 Received: from [217.6.75.131] ([217.6.75.131]:8647 "EHLO mail.internetwork-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 03:16:57 -0500 Message-ID: <3DE5D2AD.72686009@inw.de> Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 00:24:14 -0800 From: Till Immanuel Patzschke Organization: interNetwork AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: [Q] Which kernel + special patches ??? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 20 Dear list, following this list for quite a while now raised the above question. To get more specific: Given an SMP system with many thousand processes and a potentially high network and IO load, what is the best combination of source and patch, to make best use of SMP, keep load low and throughput high? Is it 2.4.x + rmap or aa or O(1) or ac or some combination OR ist it 2.5.x + one (or more) of the above patches ??? Many thanks for the help and Happy Thanksgiving! Immanuel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/