Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757494AbaGNWjV (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:39:21 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:46489 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757191AbaGNWjT (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 18:39:19 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,661,1400050800"; d="scan'208";a="456922858" Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:39:18 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Stephane Eranian Cc: Andi Kleen , Peter Zijlstra , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Don't mark DataLA addresses as store Message-ID: <20140714223918.GE5803@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1405123285-23544-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <1405123285-23544-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> <20140714192451.GC5803@tassilo.jf.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I have a problem with this patch. > > It makes: perf mem -t store rec record OP_NA for the store. > It was recording OP_STORE before. > > I think we need to keep LD/ST info. This is useful for analysis > especially if we collect loads/stores simultaneously. > > Was working before for the mem-loads, mem-stores events. Ok. Would it be enough if it only worked for "mem-stores" and not all PEBS events? Otherwise have to go back to an even larger PEBS constraint table for HSW than before. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/