Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:34:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:34:45 -0500 Received: from pc-62-31-66-70-ed.blueyonder.co.uk ([62.31.66.70]:35203 "EHLO sisko.scot.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:34:44 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 16:41:43 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: Trond Myklebust Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Ext2 devel , NFS maillist , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: [NFS] htree+NFS (NFS client bug?) Message-ID: <20021128164143.D2362@redhat.com> References: <1038354285.1302.144.camel@sherkaner.pao.digeo.com> <1038387522.31021.188.camel@ixodes.goop.org> <20021127150053.A2948@redhat.com> <15845.10815.450247.316196@charged.uio.no> <20021127205554.J2948@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no on Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:44:01PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 603 Lines: 17 Hi, On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:44:01PM +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > We could possibly cache the EOF status by overloading some other field > in the struct file. f_version comes to mind as a useful candidate, > since it automatically gets reset by llseek. If you want it to be preserved in cache, it needs to be in the inode, not in the file. --Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/