Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 01:43:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 01:43:46 -0500 Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.130.16]:8600 "EHLO pat.uio.no") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Nov 2002 01:43:45 -0500 To: KELEMEN Peter Cc: Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: NFS performance ... References: <200211241521.09981.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> <20021128110627.GD26875@chiara.elte.hu> <20021128213612.GB6321@chiara.elte.hu> From: Trond Myklebust Date: 29 Nov 2002 07:51:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20021128213612.GB6321@chiara.elte.hu> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 816 Lines: 15 >>>>> " " == KELEMEN Peter writes: > 2.4.20rc2aa1 with my .config, NFS sucked. make menuconfig, > turned off CONFIG_NFS_DIRECTIO, make -j2 bzImage modules > modules_install (no compiler errors), install kernel, lilo, > reboot, NFS flies. Confirmed on other machine as well. gcc is > 3.2.1 (Debian sid). Wish to seek more input on the case? I'd rather see if you can reproduce it on stock 2.4.20-pre4 + the NFS_ALL patch. I have a strong feeling that this is something that is particular to the aa kernels... Cheers, Trond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/