Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752639AbaGPVAm (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:00:42 -0400 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:49416 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752454AbaGPVAh (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:00:37 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Mike Turquette , Thomas Petazzoni , Stephen Boyd , Lists linaro-kernel , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Arvind Chauhan , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Sachin Kamat , Thomas P Abraham , Shawn Guo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nishanth Menon , Tomasz Figa , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , Michal Simek , Rob Herring , Santosh Shilimkar , Simon Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:18:52 +0200 Message-ID: <1450785.beFNo3ByBF@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 09:31:54 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > Cc'ing Thomas, > > On 8 July 2014 10:20, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 4 July 2014 09:51, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Yeah, having something like what you suggested from DT is the perfect > >> solution to get over this. The only reason why I am not touching that here > >> is to not delay other patches just because of that. > >> > >> There are separate threads going on for that and probably somebody > >> else was trying to push for that. > >> > >> That's it, nothing more. I would definitely like to use those bindings instead > >> of the crazy routines we are trying here, once that is finalized :) > > > > Do we have some kind of agreement for this temporary solution? Anyways > > I will kick the other thread again to resolve the bindings soon. > > Hi Mike/Rafael, > > Thomas has a dependency on the patch adding "find_siblings()": > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg348080.html > > Would it be fine to get this temporary solution (Only within cpufreq-cpu0 > file, so that it doesn't become an API) for now and updating it later once > bindings are closed? I don't like that idea, but I wonder what other people think. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/