Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753880AbaGPVMS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:12:18 -0400 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:49646 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753823AbaGPVML (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:12:11 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Vidya Sagar , matthew.garrett@nebula.com, nchumbalkar@lenovo.com, thierry.reding@gmail.com, swarren@nvidia.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kthota@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vidyas@nvidia.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI: enable ASPM configuration in PCIE POWERSAVE mode Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:30:27 +0200 Message-ID: <1480976.v66rlUIZnu@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140716193637.GA14366@google.com> References: <1405505022-7593-1-git-send-email-vidyas@nvidia.com> <20140716193637.GA14366@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, July 16, 2014 01:36:37 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:33:42PM +0530, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > From: Vidya Sagar > > > > Commit 1a680b7c3258 ("PCI: PCIe links may not get configured for ASPM > > under POWERSAVE mode") moved pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link() out of > > pci_raw_set_power_state() to pci_set_power_state() which would enable > > ASPM. But, with Commit db288c9c5f9d ("PCI / PM: restore the original > > behavior of pci_set_power_state()"), which re-introduced the following check > > ./drivers/pci/pci.c: pci_set_power_state() > > > > + /* Check if we're already there */ > > + if (dev->current_state == state) > > + return 0; > > > > in pci_set_power_state(), call to pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link() is never > > made leaving ASPM broken. > > Fix it by configuring links for ASPM in do_pci_enable_device() instead of > > pci_set_power_state() > > > > Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar > > I applied this to pci/misc for v3.17 with the following changelog: > > It would still make me feel better if Matthew and/or Rafael acked this. > > PCI: Configure ASPM when enabling device > > We can't do ASPM configuration at enumeration-time because enabling it > makes some defective hardware unresponsive, even if ASPM is disabled later > (see 41cd766b0659 ("PCI: Don't enable aspm before drivers have had a chance > to veto it"). Therefore, we have to do it after a driver claims the > device. > > We previously configured ASPM in pci_set_power_state(), but that's not a > very good place because it's not really related to setting the PCI device > power state, and doing it there means: > > - We incorrectly skipped ASPM config when setting a device that's > already in D0 to D0. > > - We unnecessarily configured ASPM when setting a device to a low-power > state (the ASPM feature only applies when the device is in D0). > > - We unnecessarily configured ASPM when called from a .resume() method > (ASPM configuration needs to be restored during resume, but I think > pci_restore_pcie_state() should already do this). > > Move ASPM configuration from pci_set_power_state() to > do_pci_enable_device() so we do it when a driver enables a device. > > [bhelgaas: changelog] > Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79621 > > It would still make me feel better if Matthew and/or Rafael chimed in to > make sure this is sane. I like the change, but I'm not sure whether or not it will work for everyone. The only way to verify that seems to be to apply it, however. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/