Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 10:23:24 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        apw@canonical.com, joe@perches.com, tytso@mit.edu, dwalter@google.com,
        bp@suse.de, neilb@suse.de, hch@infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: Remove --file option
Message-ID: <20140718082324.GA31270@pd.tnic>
References: <1405611268-12463-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>
 <53C8CCE1.4000105@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53C8CCE1.4000105@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:29:37AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> First, 'abuse' is a relative term. It describes a use you
> (and possibly many others) may find objectionable, but that
> does not mean all uses are objectionable.

Do you actually have a valid use case for keeping the cmdline switch ...

> Second, just because something is abused doesn't mean it would be
> a good idea to take it away. Many of the amendmends to the US
> Constitution can be abused. Should freedom of speech be taken away
> because it can be abused ?

... or do you feel political and want to do some waste-of-time debating
today just because its Friday?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/