Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:56:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:56:37 -0500 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:44984 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 30 Nov 2002 20:56:36 -0500 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200212010204.gB1241c12503@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Massive problems with 2.4.20 module loading To: rankincj@yahoo.com (Chris Rankin) Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 21:04:01 -0500 (EST) Cc: alan@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3DE8E271.6090307@yahoo.com> from "Chris Rankin" at Nov 30, 2002 04:08:17 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 573 Lines: 11 > Well maybe that's his problem and maybe it isn't, but he's not the only > person thinking that there's something strange about devfs in 2.4.20. I > have a 2.4.20-SMP box that is deadlocking when loading modules via > devfs. The NMI watchdog has produced two oopsen for me, which I have Could be. I don't test devfs at all - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/