Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030518AbaGRQoO (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:44:14 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:50774 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756865AbaGRQoH (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:44:07 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: K0ewJdu6/GdZugJhfMaVsREYxgf/5MPe1vpqc2hPjrdS 1405701844 Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:43:40 -0700 From: Greg KH To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Benoit Taine , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-acenic@sunsite.dk, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-hippi@sunsite.dk, industrypack-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@avagotech.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, wil6210@qca.qualcomm.com, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/25] Replace DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro use Message-ID: <20140718164340.GA24960@kroah.com> References: <1405697232-11785-1-git-send-email-benoit.taine@lip6.fr> <20140718162213.GC31114@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140718162213.GC31114@tuxdriver.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:22:13PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 05:26:47PM +0200, Benoit Taine wrote: > > We should prefer `const struct pci_device_id` over > > `DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE` to meet kernel coding style guidelines. > > This issue was reported by checkpatch. > > Honestly, I prefer the macro -- it stands-out more. Maybe the style > guidelines and/or checkpatch should change instead? The macro is horrid, no other bus has this type of thing just to save a few characters in typing, so why should PCI be "special" in this regard anymore? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/