Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754834AbaGUMDT (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:03:19 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:51078 "EHLO mail-ie0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754613AbaGUMDS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:03:18 -0400 Message-ID: <53CD018A.3080800@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 07:03:22 -0500 From: Alex Elder User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Petr_Ml=E1dek?= CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kay@vrfy.org, bp@suse.de, john.stultz@linaro.org, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] printk: initialize syslog_prev and console_prev References: <1405718885-11227-1-git-send-email-elder@linaro.org> <1405718885-11227-3-git-send-email-elder@linaro.org> <20140721100135.GB20751@pathway.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20140721100135.GB20751@pathway.suse.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/21/2014 05:01 AM, Petr Ml?dek wrote: > On Fri 2014-07-18 16:28:00, Alex Elder wrote: >> Two global variables, "syslog_prev" and "console_prev", maintain a >> copy of the flags value used in the log record most recently >> formatted for syslog or the console, respectively. >> >> Initially there is no previous formatted log record, and these >> variables simply have an initial value 0. And occasionally log >> records can get consumed at a rate such that syslog or the console >> can't keep up, in which case those variables (along with their >> corresponding position variables) must be reset. Here too, they're >> reset to 0. >> >> This patch changes it so the initial value used is LOG_NEWLINE. >> That is, if we know nothing about the prevously-formatted log >> record, we can assume it was complete, and ended with a newline. >> >> This is being done to support the next patch. Initializing >> these variables this way makes LOG_NEWLINE and LOG_CONT be >> mutually exclusive, and the next patch uses that fact to simplify >> some logic. > > I have decided to double check it and found more locations where the flags were > reset to 0: > > + "prev" variable in syslog_print_all() > + "prev" variable in kmsg_dump_get_buffer() Yes, you're right. I'm glad you checked. Some of those don't matter much (because they're only measuring the size of the needed buffer) but I'll do it on all of them for consistency. > Also I think that we should not reset it to LOG_NEWLINE when the > message is gone. I would suggest to do > > &= (LOG_CONT | LOG_NEWLINE); What you're saying is that in the case we're resetting because we couldn't keep up, we *do* in fact know something about the previously-formatted message, so we should preserve that. That's an astute observation. I like it, and will implement it. Thanks. v5 will be coming out this morning. -Alex > I mean to preserve the status of the last copied/printed piece. Then > we could put there "\n" when the last proceed piece was continuous and > the next one starts with prefix. > > The only exception would be "console_prev" in console_unlock() > because there we already add "\n" in the "** %u printk messages > dropped **" warning. > > How does that sound? > > > Best Regards, > Petr > > >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder >> Reviewed-by: Petr Ml?dek >> --- >> kernel/printk/printk.c | 10 +++++----- >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c >> index ffc9928..4034a88 100644 >> --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c >> +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c >> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(log_wait); >> /* the next printk record to read by syslog(READ) or /proc/kmsg */ >> static u64 syslog_seq; >> static u32 syslog_idx; >> -static enum log_flags syslog_prev; >> +static enum log_flags syslog_prev = LOG_NEWLINE; >> static size_t syslog_partial; >> >> /* index and sequence number of the first record stored in the buffer */ >> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static u32 log_next_idx; >> /* the next printk record to write to the console */ >> static u64 console_seq; >> static u32 console_idx; >> -static enum log_flags console_prev; >> +static enum log_flags console_prev = LOG_NEWLINE; >> >> /* the next printk record to read after the last 'clear' command */ >> static u64 clear_seq; >> @@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static int syslog_print(char __user *buf, int size) >> /* messages are gone, move to first one */ >> syslog_seq = log_first_seq; >> syslog_idx = log_first_idx; >> - syslog_prev = 0; >> + syslog_prev = LOG_NEWLINE; >> syslog_partial = 0; >> } >> if (syslog_seq == log_next_seq) { >> @@ -1301,7 +1301,7 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, bool from_file) >> /* messages are gone, move to first one */ >> syslog_seq = log_first_seq; >> syslog_idx = log_first_idx; >> - syslog_prev = 0; >> + syslog_prev = LOG_NEWLINE; >> syslog_partial = 0; >> } >> if (from_file) { >> @@ -2149,7 +2149,7 @@ again: >> /* messages are gone, move to first one */ >> console_seq = log_first_seq; >> console_idx = log_first_idx; >> - console_prev = 0; >> + console_prev = LOG_NEWLINE; >> } else { >> len = 0; >> } >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/