Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932387AbaGUNPH (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:15:07 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:57224 "EHLO mail-la0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932176AbaGUNPF (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:15:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <10657588.befqTi5XsZ@amdc1032> References: <1863399.9O2S91ZvEO@amdc1032> <10657588.befqTi5XsZ@amdc1032> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:45:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: add CPU nodes for Exynos4 SoCs From: Thomas Abraham To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Daniel Drake , linux-samsung-soc , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim , Marek Szyprowski , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Tomasz Figa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > Hi, > > On Monday, July 21, 2014 01:43:53 PM Daniel Drake wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >> wrote: >> > Recent patch by Tomasz Figa ("irqchip: gic: Fix core ID calculation >> > when topology is read from DT") fixed GIC driver to filter cluster ID >> > from values returned by cpu_logical_map() for SoCs having registers >> > mapped without per-CPU banking making it is possible to add CPU nodes >> > for Exynos4 SoCs. In case of Exynos SoCs these CPU nodes are also >> > required by future changes adding initialization of cpuidle states in >> > Exynos cpuidle driver through DT. >> >> This conflicts with work in the thread "cpufreq: use generic cpufreq >> drivers for exynos platforms" which is already in its 7th iteration. >> Perhaps best to work directly with Thomas to help him finish that series? > > Patch "[PATCH v7 4/6] ARM: dts: Exynos: add cpu nodes, opp and cpu clock > configuration data" from Thomas needs another revision anyway since it lacks > cluster ID in Exynos4210 CPU node. It also mixes addition of CPU nodes > with cpufreq specific changes and IMHO addition of CPU nodes should be in > separate patch to ease bisection if any later problems turn up. Therefore > I think that it would be the best if Thomas would rebase his work on top of > "irqchip: gic: Fix core ID calculation when topology is read from DT" patch > and this one. Thomas, are you okay with this? Hi Bartlomiej, Yes, I am okay with this. Regards, Thomas. > > Best regards, > -- > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Samsung R&D Institute Poland > Samsung Electronics > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/