Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751986AbaGVFK4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:10:56 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]:43935 "EHLO mail-lb0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751260AbaGVFKx (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:10:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140716173824.GA24357@google.com> References: <1404361654-2894-1-git-send-email-sthokal@xilinx.com> <20140716173824.GA24357@google.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:40:48 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9myUkNdb5S-lMTXzyWKi09hTL1Y Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pcie: Add Xilinx PCIe Host Bridge IP driver From: Srikanth Thokala To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Srikanth Thokala , Michal Simek , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 09:57:34AM +0530, Srikanth Thokala wrote: >> This is the driver for Xilinx AXI PCIe Host Bridge Soft IP >> >> Signed-off-by: Srikanth Thokala >> --- >> Changes in v4: >> - Regarding the comments to separate ECAM functionality, >> I have sent a separate patch and it is decided to implement >> it later. The patch is here, >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/18/54 >> - Fixed issue with adding configuration bus resource. >> - Moved the logic for setting up bus resources to probe() from >> pcie_setup(). >> - Instead of mapping all the MSI interrupts in the probe, changed >> to map only when a MSI is requested. >> - Earlier, the implementation of legacy and MSI interrupts init- >> is mutually exclusive, now changed to have the legacy interrupts >> init always and MSI interrupt init based on CONFIG_PCI_MSI flag. >> - Regarding the MSI generic implementation comment, I will plan to >> do on top of this driver patch. >> - Rebased on 3.16-rc2. >> - Fixed other minor comments. >> - Thanks Arnd and Bjorn for the review. >> >> Changes in v3: >> - Rebased on v3.15.0-rc1 >> - Added support for interrupt-map DT functionality. >> - Removed map_irq() wrapper, instead using of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(). >> - Modified resource mapping logic as per the series >> "PCI: ARM: add support for generic PCI host controller" >> - Modified devicetree binding documentation to update with interrupt- >> map properties. >> - Use devm calls wherever applicable. >> - Fixed minor comments from Jason >> - Thanks Jason for the review and suggestions. >> >> Changes in v2: >> - Rebased on v3.14.0-rc8 >> - Removed IP specific DT properties like include-rc, axibar-num etc., >> as suggested by Jason and Bjorn, Thanks >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-pcie.txt | 62 ++ >> drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 7 + >> drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/pci/host/pci-xilinx.c | 1027 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 1097 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-pcie.txt >> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pci-xilinx.c > > I see I forgot to ask for a MAINTAINERS entry for this driver. Can > you add one? There was a discussion on this earlier and Michal mentioned it is not required as it is handled by our Xilinx record. Here is the reply from Michal to the MAINTAINERS update comment, < Reply from Michal > > Please also include a MAINTAINERS update for drivers/pci/host/pci-xilinx.c. This should be handle by our record that's why MAINTAINERS update is not necessary. (N: xilinx below) ARM/ZYNQ ARCHITECTURE M: Michal Simek L: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers) W: http://wiki.xilinx.com T: git git://git.xilinx.com/linux-xlnx.git S: Supported F: arch/arm/mach-zynq/ F: drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-zynq.c N: zynq N: xilinx F: drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c F: drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c Thanks, Michal < Reply from Michal > > > I'd also like an ack from Arnd or another devicetree person for the > binding. Sure, I will request them. > > I have a few minor comments below. Sure. > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-pcie.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..3e2c88d >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/xilinx-pcie.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ >> +* Xilinx AXI PCIe Root Port Bridge DT description >> + >> +Required properties: >> +- #address-cells: Address representation for root ports, set to <3> >> +- #size-cells: Size representation for root ports, set to <2> >> +- #interrupt-cells: specifies the number of cells needed to encode an >> + interrupt source. The value must be 1. >> +- compatible: Should contain "xlnx,axi-pcie-host-1.00.a" >> +- reg: Should contain AXI PCIe registers location and length >> +- device_type: must be "pci" >> +- interrupts: Should contain AXI PCIe interrupt >> +- interrupt-map-mask, >> + interrupt-map: standard PCI properties to define the mapping of the >> + PCI interface to interrupt numbers. >> +- ranges: ranges for the PCI memory regions (I/O space region is not >> + supported by hardware) >> + Please refer to the standard PCI bus binding document for a more >> + detailed explanation >> + >> +Optional properties: >> +- bus-range: PCI bus numbers covered >> + >> +Interrupt controller child node >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> +Required properties: >> +- interrupt-controller: identifies the node as an interrupt controller >> +- #address-cells: specifies the number of cells needed to encode an >> + address. The value must be 0. >> +- #interrupt-cells: specifies the number of cells needed to encode an >> + interrupt source. The value must be 1. >> + >> +NOTE: >> +The core provides a single interrupt for both INTx/MSI messages. So, >> +created a interrupt controller node to support 'interrupt-map' DT >> +functionality. The driver will create an IRQ domain for this map, decode >> +the four INTx interrupts in ISR and route them to this domain. >> + >> + >> +Example: >> +++++++++ >> + >> + pci_express: axi-pcie@50000000 { >> + #address-cells = <3>; >> + #size-cells = <2>; >> + #interrupt-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "xlnx,axi-pcie-host-1.00.a"; >> + reg = < 0x50000000 0x10000000 >; >> + device_type = "pci"; >> + interrupts = < 0 52 4 >; >> + interrupt-map-mask = <0 0 0 7>; >> + interrupt-map = <0 0 0 1 &pcie_intc 1>, >> + <0 0 0 2 &pcie_intc 2>, >> + <0 0 0 3 &pcie_intc 3>, >> + <0 0 0 4 &pcie_intc 4>; >> + ranges = < 0x02000000 0 0x60000000 0x60000000 0 0x10000000 >; >> + >> + pcie_intc: interrupt-controller { >> + interrupt-controller; >> + #address-cells = <0>; >> + #interrupt-cells = <1>; >> + } >> + }; >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig >> index 21df477..afedcde 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig >> @@ -46,4 +46,11 @@ config PCI_HOST_GENERIC >> Say Y here if you want to support a simple generic PCI host >> controller, such as the one emulated by kvmtool. >> >> +config PCI_XILINX >> + bool "Xilinx AXI PCIe host bridge support" >> + depends on ARCH_ZYNQ >> + help >> + Say 'Y' here if you want kernel to support the Xilinx AXI PCIe >> + Host Bridge driver. >> + >> endmenu >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile >> index 611ba4b..68dfd06 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile >> @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_TEGRA) += pci-tegra.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_RCAR_GEN2) += pci-rcar-gen2.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_RCAR_GEN2_PCIE) += pcie-rcar.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_HOST_GENERIC) += pci-host-generic.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_XILINX) += pci-xilinx.o >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xilinx.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..57d59e7 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-xilinx.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,1027 @@ >> +/* >> + * PCIe host controller driver for Xilinx AXI PCIe Bridge >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2012 - 2014 Xilinx, Inc. >> + * >> + * Based on the Tegra PCIe driver >> + * >> + * Bits taken from Synopsys Designware Host controller driver and >> + * ARM PCI Host generic driver. >> + * >> + * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by >> + * the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or >> + * (at your option) any later version. >> + */ >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> +/* Register definitions */ >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_VSECC 0x00000128 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_VSECH 0x0000012c >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_BIR 0x00000130 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_BSCR 0x00000134 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_IDR 0x00000138 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_IMR 0x0000013c >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_BLR 0x00000140 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_PSCR 0x00000144 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPSC 0x00000148 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE1 0x0000014c >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2 0x00000150 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPEFR 0x00000154 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPIFR1 0x00000158 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPIFR2 0x0000015c >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_VSECC2 0x00000200 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_VSECH2 0x00000204 >> + >> +/* Interrupt registers definitions */ >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_LINK_DOWN BIT(0) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_ECRC_ERR BIT(1) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_STR_ERR BIT(2) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_HOT_RESET BIT(3) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_CFG_COMPL GENMASK(7, 5) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_CFG_TIMEOUT BIT(8) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_CORRECTABLE BIT(9) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_NONFATAL BIT(10) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_FATAL BIT(11) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_INTX BIT(16) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_MSI BIT(17) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_SLV_UNSUPP BIT(20) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_SLV_UNEXP BIT(21) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_SLV_COMPL BIT(22) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_SLV_ERRP BIT(23) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_SLV_CMPABT BIT(24) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_SLV_ILLBUR BIT(25) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_MST_DECERR BIT(26) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_MST_SLVERR BIT(27) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_INTR_MST_ERRP BIT(28) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_IMR_ALL_MASK 0x1FF30FED >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_IDR_ALL_MASK 0xFFFFFFFF >> + >> +/* Root Port Error FIFO Read Register definitions */ >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPEFR_ERR_VALID BIT(18) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPEFR_REQ_ID GENMASK(15, 0) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPEFR_ALL_MASK 0xFFFFFFFF >> + >> +/* Root Port Interrupt FIFO Read Register 1 definitions */ >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_VALID BIT(31) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_MSI_INTR BIT(30) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_ASSRT BIT(29) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_MASK GENMASK(28, 27) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_MSI_ADR_MASK GENMASK(26, 16) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_ALL_MASK 0xFFFFFFFF >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_INTR_SHIFT 27 >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR1_MSI_ADR_SHIFT 16 >> + >> +/* Bridge Info Register definitions */ >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_BIR_ECAM_SZ_MASK GENMASK(18, 16) >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_BIR_ECAM_SZ_SHIFT 16 >> + >> +/* Root Port Interrupt FIFO Read Register 2 definitions */ >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_RPIFR2_MSG_DATA GENMASK(15, 0) >> + >> +/* Root Port Status/control Register definitions */ >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPSC_BEN BIT(0) >> + >> +/* Phy Status/Control Register definitions */ >> +#define XILINX_PCIE_REG_PSCR_LNKUP BIT(11) >> + >> +/* ECAM definitions */ >> +#define ECAM_BUS_NUM_SHIFT 20 >> +#define ECAM_DEV_NUM_SHIFT 12 >> + >> +/* PCI Configuration space Bus Number Register definitions */ >> +#define PCI_SECONDARY_BUS_NUM_SHIFT 8 >> +#define PCI_SUBORDINATE_BUS_NUM_SHIFT 16 >> +#define PCI_LATENCY_TIMER_MASK GENMASK(31, 24) > > These three #defines aren't used; can you remove them? (If you need > them someday, you should either try to use generic definitions from > include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h, or if they're Xilinx-specific, rename > them so they look Xilinx-specific rather than generic. Ok. > >> + >> +/* Number of MSI IRQs */ >> +#define XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS 128 >> + >> +/* Number of Memory Resources */ >> +#define XILINX_MAX_NUM_RESOURCES 3 >> + >> +/** >> + * struct xilinx_pcie_port - PCIe port information >> + * @reg_base: IO Mapped Register Base >> + * @irq: Interrupt number >> + * @msi_pages: MSI pages >> + * @root_busno: Root Bus number >> + * @link_up: Link status flag >> + * @dev: Device pointer >> + * @irq_domain: IRQ domain pointer >> + * @bus_range: Bus range >> + * @resources: Bus Resources >> + */ >> +struct xilinx_pcie_port { >> + void __iomem *reg_base; >> + u32 irq; >> + unsigned long msi_pages; >> + u8 root_busno; >> + bool link_up; >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct irq_domain *irq_domain; >> + struct resource bus_range; >> + struct list_head resources; >> +}; >> + >> +static DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_irq_in_use, XILINX_NUM_MSI_IRQS); >> + >> +static inline struct xilinx_pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys) >> +{ >> + return sys->private_data; >> +} >> + >> +static inline u32 pcie_read(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port, u32 reg) >> +{ >> + return readl(port->reg_base + reg); >> +} >> + >> +static inline void pcie_write(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port, >> + u32 val, u32 reg) >> +{ >> + writel(val, port->reg_base + reg); >> +} >> + >> +static inline bool xilinx_pcie_is_link_up(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > Bool function names should be statements or properties, not questions, > since a statement can be true or false but a question cannot. For > example, in this case, "xilinx_pcie_link_up()" or > "xilinx_pcie_link_is_up()" would read better. Ok. > >> +{ >> + return (pcie_read(port, XILINX_PCIE_REG_PSCR) & >> + XILINX_PCIE_REG_PSCR_LNKUP) ? 1 : 0; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * xilinx_pcie_clear_err_interrupts - Clear Error Interrupts >> + * @port: PCIe port information >> + */ >> +static inline void >> +xilinx_pcie_clear_err_interrupts(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > Put the signature all on one line. It probably doesn't need to be > inline (we're making a couple register accesses, so speed isn't a > concern), and removing that will make it fit. Ok. > >> +{ >> + u32 val = pcie_read(port, XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPEFR); >> + >> + if (val & XILINX_PCIE_RPEFR_ERR_VALID) { >> + dev_dbg(port->dev, "Requester ID %d\n", >> + val & XILINX_PCIE_RPEFR_REQ_ID); >> + pcie_write(port, XILINX_PCIE_RPEFR_ALL_MASK, >> + XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPEFR); >> + } >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * xilinx_pcie_verify_config - Verify configuration >> + * @bus: PCI Bus structure >> + * @devfn: device/function >> + * >> + * Return: 0 on success and error value for invalid configuration >> + */ >> +static int xilinx_pcie_verify_config(struct pci_bus *bus, >> + unsigned int devfn) > > "verify_config" is not a great function name because it doesn't give a > good clue about what the return value is. If you make it boolean and > name it, e.g., xilinx_pcie_valid_device(), then it's obvious. Ok. > >> +{ >> + struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata); >> + >> + /* Check if link is up when trying to access downstream ports */ >> + if (bus->number != port->root_busno) >> + if (!xilinx_pcie_is_link_up(port)) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* Only one device down on each root port */ >> + if (bus->number == port->root_busno && devfn > 0) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + /* >> + * Do not read more than one device on the bus directly attached >> + * to RC. >> + */ >> + if (bus->primary == port->root_busno && devfn > 0) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * xilinx_pcie_get_config_base - Get configuration base >> + * @bus: PCI Bus structure >> + * @devfn: Device/function >> + * @where: Offset from base >> + * >> + * Return: Base address of the configuration space needed to be >> + * accessed. >> + */ >> +static void __iomem *xilinx_pcie_get_config_base(struct pci_bus *bus, >> + unsigned int devfn, >> + int where) > > "xilinx_pcie_config_base()" would be sufficient. We use "get" as a > clue that we're acquiring a reference (obviously not an issue here, > but I think the "get" in this function name is still a bit redundant.) Ok. > >> +{ >> + struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata); >> + int relbus; >> + >> + relbus = (bus->number << ECAM_BUS_NUM_SHIFT) | >> + (devfn << ECAM_DEV_NUM_SHIFT); >> + >> + return port->reg_base + relbus + where; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * xilinx_pcie_read_config - Read configuration space >> + * @bus: PCI Bus structure >> + * @devfn: Device/function >> + * @where: Offset from base >> + * @size: Byte/word/dword >> + * @val: Value to be read >> + * >> + * Return: PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL on success >> + * EINVAL/PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND/PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER >> + * on failure. >> + */ >> +static int xilinx_pcie_read_config(struct pci_bus *bus, >> + unsigned int devfn, int where, >> + int size, u32 *val) >> +{ >> + struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata); >> + void __iomem *addr; >> + >> + if (!port) { >> + BUG(); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } > > I don't think you need to test "port" for NULL here. And I don't > think callers will be prepared for -EINVAL anyway; they'll be > expecting PCIBIOS_* values. Ok, I will fix in all the suggested places. > >> + if (xilinx_pcie_verify_config(bus, devfn)) { >> + *val = 0xFFFFFFFF; >> + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; >> + } >> + */ >> +static void xilinx_pcie_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) >> +{ >> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) { > > Did you verify that this builds with both CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y and with it > unset? Yes, I have tested. < snip > >> +{ >> + port->link_up = xilinx_pcie_is_link_up(port); >> + if (!port->link_up) > > I'd use "if (port->link_up)" and reorder the dev_info() to avoid the > negation (trivial, I know, but why use the negative when the positive > works just as well?) Ok. > >> + dev_info(port->dev, "PCIe Link is DOWN\n"); >> + else >> + dev_info(port->dev, "PCIe Link is UP\n"); >> + >> + /* Disable all interrupts*/ >> + pcie_write(port, ~XILINX_PCIE_IDR_ALL_MASK, >> + XILINX_PCIE_REG_IMR); >> + >> + /* Clear pending interrupts */ >> + pcie_write(port, pcie_read(port, XILINX_PCIE_REG_IDR) & >> + XILINX_PCIE_IMR_ALL_MASK, >> + XILINX_PCIE_REG_IDR); >> + >> + /* Enable all interrupts*/ > > Missing space before "*/" (also on "Disable all interrupts" comment). Ok. > >> + pcie_write(port, XILINX_PCIE_IMR_ALL_MASK, XILINX_PCIE_REG_IMR); >> + >> + /* Enable the Bridge enable bit */ >> + pcie_write(port, pcie_read(port, XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPSC) | >> + XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPSC_BEN, >> + XILINX_PCIE_REG_RPSC); >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * xilinx_pcie_setup - Setup memory resources >> + * @nr: Bus number >> + * @sys: Per controller structure >> + * >> + * Return: '1' on success and error value on failure > > Incorrect. No point in a comment that explains obvious code anyway. > But maybe DocBook requires it, and I guess it's OK then. > Ok. >> + */ >> +static int xilinx_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys) >> +{ >> + struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = sys_to_pcie(sys); >> + >> + list_splice_init(&port->resources, &sys->resources); >> + >> + return 1; >> +} >> + >> +/** >> + * xilinx_pcie_scan_bus - Scan PCIe bus for devices >> + * @nr: Bus number >> + * @sys: Per controller structure >> + * >> + * Return: Valid Bus pointer on success and NULL on failure >> + */ >> +static struct pci_bus __init *xilinx_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, >> + struct pci_sys_data *sys) >> +{ >> + struct xilinx_pcie_port *port = sys_to_pcie(sys); >> + struct pci_bus *bus; >> + >> + if (port) { > > I think this test (and the BUG()) is superfluous. I don't think it's > possible to get here with sys->private_data == NULL. And if we do, > we'll take a null pointer fault and get a nice backtrace anyway. Ok. > >> + port->root_busno = sys->busnr; >> + bus = pci_scan_root_bus(port->dev, sys->busnr, &xilinx_pcie_ops, >> + sys, &sys->resources); >> + } else { >> + bus = NULL; >> + BUG(); >> + } < snip > >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc"); >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx AXI PCIe driver"); >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2"); > > I think you want "GPL v2" here (with the space; see > license_is_gpl_compatible()). I will fix them in my v5. Thanks for the review, Srikanth. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/