Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:49:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:49:39 -0500 Received: from [198.149.18.6] ([198.149.18.6]:38538 "EHLO tolkor.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:49:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:11:01 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: marcelo@connectiva.com.br.munich.sgi.com, rml@tech9.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4 Message-ID: <20021202201101.A26164@sgi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Martin J. Bligh" , marcelo@connectiva.com.br, rml@tech9.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021202192652.A25938@sgi.com> <1919608311.1038822649@[10.10.2.3]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <1919608311.1038822649@[10.10.2.3]>; from mbligh@aracnet.com on Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:50:50AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 601 Lines: 15 On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:50:50AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > There was talk of merging the O(1) scheduler into 2.4 at OLS. > If every distro has it, and 2.5 has it, and it's been around for > this long, I think that proves it stable. > > Marcelo, what are the chances of getting this merged into mainline > in the 2.4.20 timeframe? Ingo vetoed it. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/