Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:47:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:47:04 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:4556 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 12:47:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 09:50:50 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Christoph Hellwig , marcelo@connectiva.com.br.munich.sgi.com, rml@tech9.net cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4 Message-ID: <1919608311.1038822649@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <20021202192652.A25938@sgi.com> References: <20021202192652.A25938@sgi.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 693 Lines: 19 > now that all commercial vendors ship a backport of Ingo's O(1) > scheduler external projects like XFS have to track those projects > in addition to the mainline kernel. There was talk of merging the O(1) scheduler into 2.4 at OLS. If every distro has it, and 2.5 has it, and it's been around for this long, I think that proves it stable. Marcelo, what are the chances of getting this merged into mainline in the 2.4.20 timeframe? Thanks, M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/