Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264838AbSLBSg0>; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:36:26 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264836AbSLBSgZ>; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:36:25 -0500
Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:45384 "EHLO
	devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S264838AbSLBSgY>; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:36:24 -0500
From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <200212021842.gB2Igou00740@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: LM sensors into kernel?
To: davidsen@tmr.com (Bill Davidsen)
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:42:50 -0500 (EST)
Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), pavel@ucw.cz (Pavel Machek),
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (kernel list)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1021202133323.433C-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com> from "Bill Davidsen" at Dec 02, 2002 01:37:04 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 655
Lines: 14

> Really? I know he controls what goes in the mainline, but I thought you
> put in what you found useful in your kernel. Certainly rmap was there
> until it was old enough to vote.
> 
> Clearly lm_sensors do have value in a production environment.

2.4-ac is a bit different. 2.5-ac is stuff Im holding to get a working
2.5 to test with. Im trying to avoid getting anything in it Linus wont
have taken by 2.6.0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/