Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:56:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:56:19 -0500 Received: from sweetums.bluetronic.net ([24.199.150.42]:43731 "EHLO sweetums.bluetronic.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 13:56:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 14:03:47 -0500 (EST) From: Ricky Beam To: Linux Kernel Mail List Subject: Re: Possible Module Loader bug... In-Reply-To: <20021202233050.66669be9.neokeats@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 877 Lines: 24 On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Keats wrote: >Kernel version : 2.5.50 >lsmod >QM_MODULES: function not implemented ... Perhaps it would be a better idea to have the syscall vectors for the old module functions do something other than simply return as not implemented. Something along the lines of "(foo) attempted to use old module interface" instead of simply deleting the functions entirely. Otherwise, there are going to be 10 million people asking why modules don't work anymore. There is exactly ZERO indication that things have changed. (The changes to the keyboard and pc speaker "beep" will have people confused as well.) --Ricky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/