Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:27:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:27:12 -0500 Received: from vp175097.reshsg.uci.edu ([128.195.175.97]:60429 "EHLO moisil.dev.hydraweb.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 06:26:55 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 03:26:51 -0800 Message-Id: <200102081126.f18BQpS18016@moisil.dev.hydraweb.com> From: Ion Badulescu To: vido@ldh.org Cc: Alan Cox , Andrey Savochkin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] eepro100.c, kernel 2.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20010208201539.A19229@ldh.org> User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.18 (i586)) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Feb 2001 20:15:39 +0900, Augustin Vidovic wrote: >> So what _were_ those messages? Can you post them? > > No I can't because they were suppressed by the syslogd (DOS protection), only > their number being reported (several thousands every few seconds). syslogd does not suppress messages, it suppresses *identical* messages. So what was the *first* message logged by syslogd, the one followed by "last message repeated XXX times"? >> Well, your patch disables the work-around exactly for those (really old) cards >> that actually need it and enables it for those that don't need it. > > No, because the test usede for the activation is now the same as the one used > for the diagnostic, which means that every card which is diagnosed to have the > bug get the workaround activated. Umm, no. With your patch, both the diagnostic and the activation are wrong, whereas before only the diagnostic was wrong. >> eth0: Sending a multicast list set command from a timer routine........." >> >> If you find such messages, the work-around really did something. Otherwise, >> it's the placebo effect... > > Now, I do not get _any_ message in the logs, which means that the network > cards activity is closer to normality than before the patch. So your patch did not do you any good. Case closed, as far as the work-around is concerned. If you post the original log messages, we might be able to find the real bug... [and please don't drop the Cc:] Ion -- It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/