Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:04:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:04:40 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:33550 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 16:04:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 21:11:53 +0000 (GMT) From: James Simmons To: Joseph Fannin cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Re: Fbdev 2.5.49 BK fixes. In-Reply-To: <20021128083246.GA2703@zion.rivenstone.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1141 Lines: 30 > aty128fb works for me here with: > > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 PF/PRO AGP 4x TMDS > > Thank you! Great. I made more inprovements with my latest patch. Give it a try. > There are a few glitches, but I've been unable to pin down > anything serious as the fbdev patch's fault. I'm still playing with > things (like Antonio Daplas' patches). I'll give a more full report > later. I just intergrated a bunch of his work. The subsystem is starting to really take shape. > FWIW, the fbdev patch applies with a few minor offsets to 2.5.50 > except for the attached patch, which I extracted from bk. So if you > apply this patch in *reverse* to a clean 2.5.50 tree, the fbdev patch > should then apply okay (patch complained about a reversed hunk in > fbcon.c, but it should be harmless, I think.) I noticed. My new patch fixes that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/