Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 17:06:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 17:06:27 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:51871 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 17:06:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4 From: Alan Cox To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , marcelo@connectiva.com.br.munich.sgi.com, rml@tech9.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021202201101.A26164@sgi.com> References: <20021202192652.A25938@sgi.com> <1919608311.1038822649@[10.10.2.3]> <20021202201101.A26164@sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 02 Dec 2002 22:47:28 +0000 Message-Id: <1038869248.8945.18.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 704 Lines: 18 On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 01:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:50:50AM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > There was talk of merging the O(1) scheduler into 2.4 at OLS. > > If every distro has it, and 2.5 has it, and it's been around for > > this long, I think that proves it stable. > > > > Marcelo, what are the chances of getting this merged into mainline > > in the 2.4.20 timeframe? > > Ingo vetoed it. I wasnt aware Ingo had a veto - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/