Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758355AbaGWPbh (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:31:37 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:36838 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755732AbaGWPbf (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 11:31:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 16:31:25 +0100 From: Sitsofe Wheeler To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@linuxdriverproject.org, ohering@suse.com, apw@canonical.com, jasowang@redhat.com, jbottomley@parallels.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Add blist flags Message-ID: <20140723153125.GA520@sucs.org> References: <1405983961-18782-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <20140723100448.GA2540@sucs.org> <20140723115128.GB16881@infradead.org> <20140723125443.GA16103@sucs.org> <20140723141014.GA892@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140723141014.GA892@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 07:10:14AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:54:43PM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > That's good to know (I was worried the device would not be detected as > > supporting discard because it doesn't report lbpme and doesn't declare a > > conformance version (see below)). > > Ok, that makes things worse - you might be able to force it through > sysfs, though. I've got a hack that seems to be working for me - see below. > > Is there a tree with all these updates > > in or do they need to be pieced together from this email thread? > > I'm picking this up for my scsi-queue tree. Still need a review > for the patch we're replying to before that one can go in, though. OK. > > Additionally is it worth quirking sd_try_rc16_first on when > > BLIST_TRY_VPD_PAGES is present? > > Sounds reasonable to me. OK did you want me to post a set of changes to your patch? I've basically changed the patches from bypassing the SCSI level check (to allow scanning of VPD pages) to also try READ_CAPACITY(16) first and bypass lbpme checks. Now it's more of a case of BLIST_TRY_LBP... -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/