Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:47:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:47:21 -0500 Received: from hitchcock.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.23]:64280 "EHLO hitchcock.mail.mindspring.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 20:47:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 20:54:50 -0500 From: To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: joeja@mindspring.com Subject: iptables mangle Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: 4.20.162.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1167 Lines: 31 Not sure if this should be posted here, but I already asked the people at netfilter.org and got no reply. This was a while ago! I started looking at my firewall rules and running iptables -L -v and also -t nat -t mangle to see what is being dropped and passed. It seems that the mangle table is now connected to all 5 tables ( or so the docs say as of 2.4.18 this changed, I am using 2.4.19 on RH 7.3), so I modified my rules to take this into account. I also noticed that there is the REJECT option to -j available to the INPUT, FORWARD and OUTPUT chains. Problem is it does not work in the INPUT chain of the mangle table. Is this a bug or just not implemented yet or do I need a newer version of iptables? I have iptables 1.2.6 ( I think it is "1.2.6a" but have to double check on that). It works on the INPUT chain of the default filter table, shouldn't it work on mangle as well? not on the list: Thanks Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/