Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 22:43:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 22:43:20 -0500 Received: from imta1.castel.nl ([195.85.130.95]:57848 "EHLO imta1.keyaccess.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 22:43:19 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rene Herman To: Andrew Gierth , erik@hensema.xs4all.nl, md@linux.it Subject: Re: bincancels in linux.kernel Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 04:49:13 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021202221858.GA3289@hensema.net> <87fztflvmj.fsf@erlenstar.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <87fztflvmj.fsf@erlenstar.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <02120304491301.00232@7ixe4> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2490 Lines: 53 On Tuesday 03 December 2002 02:49, Andrew Gierth wrote: > I don't personally consider that the fact that a group is gatewayed > from a mailing list to be significant when deciding how to apply Usenet > policies to it. Andrew, please note that I as a user of linux.kernel do actually consider it significant. LKML (the gated list) is not part of Usenet and the mere fact that at some point it is gated to a newsgroup and transported further via NNTP doesn't make it a part. It's merely a service to people (like me) who find a news interface more convenient and/or have trouble dealing with the large volume of messages via mail. Furthermore (or "that aside", if you want ... ), although I guess I could conceivably be sympathetic to your cause of ridding Usenet from as much in-appropriate content as possible, linux kernel patches, including binary encoded ones, are not in fact in-appropriate content for linux.kernel, either the list or the newsgroup. Even on the mailing-list plain text patches are preffered, but when the patch is large gzipping it is actually recommended: http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s4-1 You for example today cancelled a completely appropriate post from Art Haas (http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0212.0/0302.html) and I will admit that actually annoys me quite a bit. > Erik> The gated list is linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Cc), a list to > Erik> which sometimes binary patches are posted. IMHO binaries are > Erik> acceptable in linux.kernel. > > well, I would have to disagree (even if you don't think that binaries > coming via the mailing list would be a problem, there is still the > question of binaries posted via news Fortunately, linux-kernel (the list) has active filtering itself, so anything in-appropriate comming in through news will be filtered out in the same way as the ones comming in through mail. Of course that doesn't help us NNTP readers, but I guess we'll just have to deal with that. LKML is not strictly non-binary-only, so cancelling simply on the criterium of binary attachments is very inappropriate. Might I therefore respectfully suggest you keep the bin-cancelling suspended? Rene. P.S. offline for a while, so will not be able to reply quickly. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/