Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754833AbaGXJFQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:05:16 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:50947 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751708AbaGXJFO (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 05:05:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 11:05:10 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Hayes Wang Cc: nic_swsd , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , lkml Subject: Re: 3.16-rc6+: r8169 fresh new irq lock inversion Message-ID: <20140724090510.GD19239@pd.tnic> References: <20140722081840.GA6462@pd.tnic> <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2510016@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2510016@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:01:27AM +0000, Hayes Wang wrote: > I have no idea about why you see the messages. I don't think > the patches which submitted previously for r8169.c would cause > the problem. Although I have submitted some patches about IPv6, > the hw checksum should be off by default. That is, the behavior > should be the same with the previous one. Yeah, the culprit might be somewhere else, follow this thread: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140723095327.GA23131@pd.tnic Thanks for taking a look anyway though. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/