Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 04:24:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 04:24:21 -0500 Received: from node-d-1ea6.a2000.nl ([62.195.30.166]:18670 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 04:24:18 -0500 Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates From: Arjan van de Ven To: marcelo@conectiva.com.br Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Grover, Andrew" In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 03 Dec 2002 10:31:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1038907891.10619.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1029 Lines: 27 On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 20:29, Grover, Andrew wrote: > arch/i386/kernel/acpitable.c | 554 ---- > arch/i386/kernel/acpitable.h | 260 -- Marcelo, Please don't merge this. This patch removes existing, small, working, maintained functionality from the kernel and "replaces" it with something else for which patches aren't even accepted and that is a lot bigger and less readable code. Not only is it rude on the side of the ACPI people to remove "competing" functionality, but it will break all kinds of existing setups that now have to change the way they configure their system. In addition it's not even needed, the existing code can live together with the code Andrew proposes just fine as the United Linux kernel proves. Greetings, Arjan van de Ven - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/