Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 07:15:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 07:15:42 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:48052 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 07:15:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:18:58 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: "Vamsi Krishna S ." Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, lkml , dprobes , richard , tom Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for 2.5.50-bk2 Message-ID: <20021203121858.GC30431@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , "Vamsi Krishna S ." , torvalds@transmeta.com, lkml , dprobes , richard , tom References: <20021203125447.A2951@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021203125447.A2951@in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 722 Lines: 21 On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:54:47PM +0530, Vamsi Krishna S . wrote: > kprobes allows trapping at almost any kernel address, useful for > various kernel-hacking tasks, and building on for more > infrastructure. This last part just got me thinking. What stops someone for example using this to implement a binary only replacement of the TCP/IP stack, or any other part of the kernel for that matter ? Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/