Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759244AbaGXNs4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:48:56 -0400 Received: from grace.univie.ac.at ([131.130.3.115]:41541 "EHLO grace.univie.ac.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758923AbaGXNsy (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 09:48:54 -0400 Message-ID: <53D10EC3.8030004@univie.ac.at> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:48:51 +0200 From: "Klaus A. Kreil" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Woody Suwalski CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: unable to mount using overlayfs.v22 on kernel 3.15.5 References: <53CEDA35.40301@univie.ac.at> <53D0F89B.4090907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <53D0F89B.4090907@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Univie-Virus-Scan: scanned by ClamAV on justin.univie.ac.at Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Woody, my message obviously ended up in the wrong list due to a mistake of mine. I originally thought it got lost until your reply as I am not subscribed to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org. But: There is already a discussion about this issue going on at linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org with Miklos Szeredi, the author of overlayfs. He has kindly pointed me towards the correct list when I sent him a PM about the problem and he rightly has taken the issue to linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org. I think it would be good if you joined us there to keep related things together. Thanks, Klaus Am 24.07.14 14:14, schrieb Woody Suwalski: > Klaus A. Kreil wrote: >> Hello list, >> I have just found out about this mailing list which obviously also >> takes care of overlayfs. >> >> I have been a happy user of overlayfs for quiet some time using it to >> propagate a shared r/o LVM ext4 lowerdir rootfs with a small r/w ext4 >> upperdir for a number of XEN domU guests. I started with overlayfs on >> kernel version 3.11.7 (all on gentoo-hardened). Recently I have >> switched from 3.13.10 (using overlayfs.v21) to 3.15.5 with overlayfs.v22. >> >> overlayfs.v22 seems to have changed insofar as there's a new parameter >> workdir=/dir with dir required to be an empty directory on the same >> filesystem as upperdir. So I have changed my initramfs to include that >> parameter and have also created my /dir directory (named /.work, owned >> by root:root and 0755 mode) on all my individual upperdir filesystems >> for all of my XEN domUs. >> >> Now when I start the new kernel 3.15.5 with the modified init script >> from the newly created initramfs, I am ending up in a rescue shell. >> Both the upper and lower filesystem are (as expected) mounted >> appropriately to /mnt/root_ro and /mnt/root_rw amd /mnt/root exists. >> Howeverm, trying to combine those two filesystems on /mnt/root (as >> before and regardless of whether used with or without the workdir= >> parameter) fails with an error message as follows: >> >> # mount -t overlayfs overlayfs -o >> lowerdir=/mnt/root_ro,upperdir=/mnt/root_rw,workdir=/.work /mnt/root >> mount: mounting overlayfs on /mnt/root failed: Invalid argument >> >> The error message stays the same regardless of where on the command >> line the overlayfs "device" parameter appears. I can't see what's >> wrong with the command line given that - with the exception of the >> workdir=/.work part - the command has not changed from 3.13.10 >> (overlayfs.v21), therefore currently leaving me at loss. >> >> I would very much appreciate any help and support in tracking down >> this unexpected issue. >> >> Regards Atom2 > Klaus, I have run into similar problems... > What works for me: > Once you mount the upperdir /mnt/root_rw, create /mnt/root_rw/root and > /mnt/root_rw/workdir and use these for overlayfs mountpoints. > > Woody -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/