Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934432AbaGXTV5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:21:57 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]:50604 "EHLO mail-lb0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934246AbaGXTVz (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jul 2014 15:21:55 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:21:52 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Kees Cook Cc: LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Andrew Vagin , "Eric W. Biederman" , "H. Peter Anvin" , Serge Hallyn , Pavel Emelyanov , Vasiliy Kulikov , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Michael Kerrisk-manpages , Julien Tinnes Subject: Re: [rfc 1/4] mm: Introduce may_adjust_brk helper Message-ID: <20140724192152.GC17876@moon> References: <20140724164657.452106845@openvz.org> <20140724165047.437075575@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:18:56PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > +static inline int may_adjust_brk(unsigned long rlim, > > + unsigned long new_brk, > > + unsigned long start_brk, > > + unsigned long end_data, > > + unsigned long start_data) > > +{ > > + if (rlim < RLIMIT_DATA) { > > Won't rlim always be the value from a call to rlimit(RLIMIT_DATA)? Is > there a good reason to not just put the rlimit() call in > may_adjust_brk()? This would actually be an optimization in the > prctl_set_mm case, since now it calls rlimit() unconditionally, but > doesn't need to. Nope, we use it for rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK) when checking for @start_stack member. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/