Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:13:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:13:53 -0500 Received: from rtlab.med.cornell.edu ([140.251.145.175]:43705 "HELO openlab.rtlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:13:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:21:23 -0500 (EST) From: "Calin A. Culianu" X-X-Sender: To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: SMP Pentium4 -- PAUSE Instruction In-Reply-To: <1038931576.20262.0.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 821 Lines: 25 :) Oh. Don't I feel like I hit the panic button too early... :/ -Calin On 3 Dec 2002, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 16:42, Calin A. Culianu wrote: > > > Is this instruction being used in spin-wait loops? For some reason, I am > > having a hard time figuring out whether or not it is being used. There is > > a rep_nop() in processor.h.. but I can't determine if that is being called > > for spin lock lock/unlock code. > > check cpu_relax() all over the kernel :) > and the spinlock code uses it inside it's own asm directly, not via > rep_nop() > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/