Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:25:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:25:55 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:48795 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 3 Dec 2002 15:25:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:33:23 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lkml, bugme.osdl.org? Message-ID: <95600000.1038947602@titus> In-Reply-To: <200212030724.gB37O4DL001318@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <200212030724.gB37O4DL001318@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 900 Lines: 21 > Out of curiosity, is it preferred that if bugs/patches get found, that > they be posted here, to the Bugzilla database, or both? I've been > putting them at both places, so there's discussion here and a history > there... I'd say both. Be careful not to file duplicates in Bugzilla though. People attatching patches to existing bugs in Bugzilla are especially welcome ;-) Bugs will get closed out once they're fixed in the next full release of mainline, so Bugzilla shouldn't get too cluttered. We need to have a better (more searchable) version field, but that needs some more complex Bugzilla rework ... we're thinking about how best to do it. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/