Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 03:35:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 03:35:48 -0500 Received: from denise.shiny.it ([194.20.232.1]:42948 "EHLO denise.shiny.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 03:35:47 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1038953338.3ded2b7a5fe0d@kolivas.net> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 09:43:15 +0100 (CET) From: Giuliano Pochini To: Con Kolivas Subject: RE: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.40-mm1 with contest Cc: linux kernel mailing list Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 640 Lines: 22 On 03-Dec-2002 Con Kolivas wrote: > > UP results > > process_load: > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > 2.4.20 [5] 108.1 58 84 40 1.62 > 2.5.50-mm1 [5] 86.6 78 18 20 1.30 Hm, load task gets half cpu time, but it goes 5 times slower in 2.5.x. Why ? You can see a similar behaviour in other tests too. Bye. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/