Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 03:49:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 03:49:08 -0500 Received: from denise.shiny.it ([194.20.232.1]:6597 "EHLO denise.shiny.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 03:49:08 -0500 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7 on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20021204020838.GF3807@txc.com> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 09:56:33 +0100 (CET) From: Giuliano Pochini To: Igor Schein Subject: RE: performance of cache-intensive applications Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 669 Lines: 20 On 04-Dec-2002 Igor Schein wrote: > Hi, > > I am using an open-source application on ix86 to perform a task which > is cache-intensive. When I run consecutive iterations of the task on > a fixed input, the variance in timing of each iteration is extemely > high. Needless to say, the test machine is always non-occupied. CPU bound or I/O bound ? What kernel version ? IDE or SCSI ? vmstat ? Other details ? Bye. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/