Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 06:51:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 06:51:10 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:8196 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 06:51:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:57:43 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linus , LKML , anton@samba.org, "David S. Miller" , ak@muc.de, davidm@hpl.hp.com, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ralf@gnu.org, willy@debian.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] compatibility syscall layer (lets try again) Message-ID: <20021204115743.GA6494@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20021204180224.406d143c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021204180224.406d143c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 809 Lines: 20 Hi! > Below is the generic part of the start of the compatibility syscall layer. > I think I have made it generic enough that each architecture can define > what compatibility means. > > To use this,an architecture must create asm/compat.h and provide typedefs > for (currently) compat_time_t, compat_suseconds_t, struct compat_timespec. ~~~~ Maybe we need better name? This is too easy to missparse ;-). Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/