Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752857AbaG1MVN (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:21:13 -0400 Received: from top.free-electrons.com ([176.31.233.9]:38609 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbaG1MVK (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jul 2014 08:21:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:21:03 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Jiri Prchal Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, voice.shen@atmel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: spi: request all csgpio in spi probe Message-ID: <20140728122103.GR9532@piout.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Thank you for that patch, a few questions/comments below. On 28/07/2014 at 13:43:40 +0200, Jiri Prchal wrote : > This fix problem with PA14 set as periph A left from ROMBOOT and need it > to be set to gpio before spi bus communicate with chip on CS0 on other > gpio. As I reported a week ago. > Request all csgpios in spi_probe since cs depends on each other and must > be all of them in right state before any communication on bus. They are > part of bus, like miso, mosi, clk, not part of chips, they are defined > in parent spi node, not in child chip node. > Csgpio moved to atmel_spi struct as part of master bus. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Prchal > --- > drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c > index 92a6f0d..1fb7bb9 100644 > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c > @@ -22,11 +22,14 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > #include > > +#define DRIVER_NAME "atmel-spi" > + This is not really related to the issue solved by that patch, maybe it could go in another patch ? > /* SPI register offsets */ > #define SPI_CR 0x0000 > #define SPI_MR 0x0004 > @@ -242,11 +245,13 @@ struct atmel_spi { > > bool keep_cs; > bool cs_active; > + > + /* chip selects */ > + unsigned int csgpio[]; > }; > > /* Controller-specific per-slave state */ > struct atmel_spi_device { > - unsigned int npcs_pin; > u32 csr; > }; > > @@ -312,7 +317,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi) > } > > mr = spi_readl(as, MR); > - gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active); > + gpio_set_value(as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], active); > } else { > u32 cpol = (spi->mode & SPI_CPOL) ? SPI_BIT(CPOL) : 0; > int i; > @@ -329,18 +334,16 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi) > mr = spi_readl(as, MR); > mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, ~(1 << spi->chip_select), mr); > if (spi->chip_select != 0) > - gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active); > + gpio_set_value(as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], active); > spi_writel(as, MR, mr); > } > > dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "activate %u%s, mr %08x\n", > - asd->npcs_pin, active ? " (high)" : "", > - mr); > + as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], active ? " (high)" : "", mr); > } > > static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi) > { > - struct atmel_spi_device *asd = spi->controller_state; > unsigned active = spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH; > u32 mr; > > @@ -354,11 +357,10 @@ static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi) > } > > dev_dbg(&spi->dev, "DEactivate %u%s, mr %08x\n", > - asd->npcs_pin, active ? " (low)" : "", > - mr); > + as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], active ? " (low)" : "", mr); > > if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) || spi->chip_select != 0) > - gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, !active); > + gpio_set_value(as->csgpio[spi->chip_select], !active); > } > > static void atmel_spi_lock(struct atmel_spi *as) __acquires(&as->lock) > @@ -989,8 +991,6 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) > struct atmel_spi_device *asd; > u32 csr; > unsigned int bits = spi->bits_per_word; > - unsigned int npcs_pin; > - int ret; > > as = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); > > @@ -1017,27 +1017,13 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) > csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBS, 0); > csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBCT, 0); > > - /* chipselect must have been muxed as GPIO (e.g. in board setup) */ > - npcs_pin = (unsigned int)spi->controller_data; > - > - if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio)) > - npcs_pin = spi->cs_gpio; > - > asd = spi->controller_state; > if (!asd) { > asd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct atmel_spi_device), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!asd) > return -ENOMEM; > > - ret = gpio_request(npcs_pin, dev_name(&spi->dev)); > - if (ret) { > - kfree(asd); > - return ret; > - } > - > - asd->npcs_pin = npcs_pin; > spi->controller_state = asd; > - gpio_direction_output(npcs_pin, !(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)); > } > > asd->csr = csr; > @@ -1290,6 +1276,15 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > int ret; > struct spi_master *master; > struct atmel_spi *as; > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; > + int num_cs, i; > + > + if (!np) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + num_cs = of_gpio_named_count(np, "cs-gpios"); > + if (num_cs < 0) > + return num_cs; > This driver can still be probed without DT, this will break here, please don't assume that DT is present. > /* Select default pin state */ > pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(&pdev->dev); > @@ -1308,7 +1303,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > /* setup spi core then atmel-specific driver state */ > ret = -ENOMEM; > - master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*as)); > + master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*as) + num_cs * sizeof(unsigned)); > if (!master) > goto out_free; > > @@ -1317,7 +1312,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > master->bits_per_word_mask = SPI_BPW_RANGE_MASK(8, 16); > master->dev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; > master->bus_num = pdev->id; > - master->num_chipselect = master->dev.of_node ? 0 : 4; > + master->num_chipselect = num_cs; My guess is that you don't need to change that part. > master->setup = atmel_spi_setup; > master->transfer_one_message = atmel_spi_transfer_one_message; > master->cleanup = atmel_spi_cleanup; > @@ -1325,6 +1320,25 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > as = spi_master_get_devdata(master); > > + for (i = 0; i < master->num_chipselect; ++i) { > + ret = of_get_named_gpio(np, "cs-gpios", i); Again, DT maybe not be compiled in or that driver may be probed from platform data. > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get csgpio#%u (%d)\n", > + i, ret); > + goto out_free; > + } > + as->csgpio[i] = ret; > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "csgpio#%u = %u\n", i, as->csgpio[i]); > + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(&pdev->dev, as->csgpio[i], > + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, DRIVER_NAME); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, > + "failed to configure csgpio#%u (%d)\n", > + i, ret); > + goto out_free; > + } > + } > + > /* > * Scratch buffer is used for throwaway rx and tx data. > * It's coherent to minimize dcache pollution. > -- > 1.9.1 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/