Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 07:54:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 07:54:12 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:44480 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 07:54:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 12:58:52 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: "Grover, Andrew" , marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] ACPI updates Message-ID: <20021204125852.GE647@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Arjan van de Ven , "Grover, Andrew" , marcelo@conectiva.com.br, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20021203184705.A23371@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021203184705.A23371@devserv.devel.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 23 On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 06:47:05PM -0500, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 03:29:56PM -0800, Grover, Andrew wrote: > > Well maybe that's what we should do - use the UnitedLinux ACPI patch (which > > No. What UL did was to put back the code you remove. YOU can do that > better I'm sure, since you actively remove it in your patch; > just not doing that is obviously simpler... There's also a few other things in the UL patch Andi did iirc, things like 'dont use ACPI if the BIOS date is <2000', which seems to be a good universal crap-acpi-bios detector. (You can still override this with a bootarg iirc) Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/