Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:22:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:22:07 -0500 Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.81]:27040 "EHLO mailout03.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:22:06 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:29:20 +0100 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] deprecate use of bdflush() Message-ID: <20021204192919.GA3969@neljae> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1038935401.994.9.camel@phantasy> <20021204131024.GA3428@neljae> <1039018361.1505.7.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1039018361.1505.7.camel@phantasy> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Daniel Kobras Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 815 Lines: 20 On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 11:12:42AM -0500, Robert Love wrote: > There are no flushing parameters in 2.5, and this is a patch for 2.5. I'm aware of that. And I'm not opposed to the patch, but I'm opposed to the notion that sys_bdflush as a whole has been useless for ages. E.g. noflushd[1] on 2.4 happily calls it every five seconds. Count this as a vote for rate limiting the message, for the benefit of folks switching between 2.4 and 2.5. Regards, Daniel. [1] Admittedly a bad example as it won't start on 2.5 anyway, but there might be similar codes around. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/