Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751566AbaG2Rdq (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:33:46 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:44930 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751321AbaG2Rdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:33:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:33:32 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, bobby.prani@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks() Message-ID: <20140729173332.GM3935@laptop> References: <20140728225556.GA19493@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1406588180-21933-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140729081416.GR20603@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20140729172304.GA16073@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140729172304.GA16073@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:23:04AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:14:16AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 03:56:12PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > @@ -254,6 +254,8 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user) > > > rcu_sched_qs(cpu); > > > else if (!in_softirq()) > > > rcu_bh_qs(cpu); > > > + if (user) > > > + rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current); > > > } > > > > There's nothing like sending email you can't find something... :-) > > Well, this is unfortunately only a partial solution. It does not handle > the NO_HZ_FULL scheduling-clock-free usermode execution. I have ink on > paper indicating a couple of ways to do that, but figured I should get > feedback on this stuff before going too much farther. Yah, so the nohz_full already has the horrid overhead of user<->kernel switches, so you can 'trivially' hook into those. FWIW its _the_ thing that makes nohz_full uninteresting for me. The required overhead is insane. But yes there are people willing to pay that etc.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/