Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:39:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:39:29 -0500 Received: from host194.steeleye.com ([66.206.164.34]:15368 "EHLO pogo.mtv1.steeleye.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 4 Dec 2002 16:39:28 -0500 Message-Id: <200212042146.gB4Lkw804422@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Miles Bader cc: James Bottomley , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] generic device DMA implementation In-Reply-To: Message from Miles Bader of "05 Dec 2002 06:21:42 +0900." <87smxdiiop.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 15:46:58 -0600 From: James Bottomley X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 979 Lines: 26 miles@gnu.org said: > How is the driver supposed to tell whether a given dma_addr_t value > represents consistent memory or not? It seems like an (arch-specific) > `dma_addr_is_consistent' function is necessary, but I couldn't see one > in your patch. well, the patch was only for x86, which is fully consistent. For parisc, that becomes a field for the dma accessor functions. However, even on parisc, the (supported) machines are either entirely consistent or entirely inconsistent. If you have a machine that has both consistent and inconsistent blocks, you need to encode that in dma_addr_t (which is a platform definable type). The sync functions would just decode the type and either nop or perform the sync. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/