Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755924AbaGaBgF (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:36:05 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:55803 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752518AbaGaBgB (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:36:01 -0400 Message-ID: <53D99D80.8090905@codeaurora.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:36:00 -0700 From: Saravana Kannan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: Prarit Bhargava , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , Lenny Szubowicz , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq, store_scaling_governor requires policy->rwsem to be held for duration of changing governors [v2] References: <1406634362-811-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> <1727443.QxEjMbNBsd@vostro.rjw.lan> <53D8FEB1.5040808@redhat.com> <1816455.s1k7EgIPj9@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <1816455.s1k7EgIPj9@vostro.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/30/2014 02:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 10:18:25 AM Prarit Bhargava wrote: >> >> On 07/29/2014 08:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 07:46:02 AM Prarit Bhargava wrote: > > [cut] > >>>> This patch effectively reverts commit 955ef483. The issue reported in this patch is valid. We are seeing that internally too. I believe I reported it in another thread (within the past month). However, the original patch fixes a real deadlock issue (I'm too tired to look it up now). We can revet the original, but it's going to bring back the original issue. I just want to make sure Prarit and Raphael realize this before proceeding. I do have plans for a proper fix for the mainline (not stable branches), but plan to do that after the current set of suspend/hotplug patches go through. The fix would be easier to make after that. >>> >>> OK, I'm convinced by this. >>> >>> I suppose we should push it for -stable from 3.10 through 3.15.x, right? >> >> Rafael, I think that is a good idea. I'm not sure what the protocol is for >> adding stable@kernel.org though ... > > I'll take care of this, thanks! > But you aren't going to pull the in for the next release, right? -Saravana -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/