Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751938AbaGaTFZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:05:25 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:51348 "EHLO mail-wg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750859AbaGaTFX (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:05:23 -0400 Message-ID: <53DA936E.9060004@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 21:05:18 +0200 From: Tomasz Figa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stephan van Schaik , Vincent Palatin , Doug Anderson , Javier Martinez Canillas , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: dts: Add exynos5250-spring device tree References: <1406822910-6255-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1406822910-6255-5-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1406822910-6255-5-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andreas, Sorry for joining the party a bit late, but there were patches with less people involved so I preferred to review them first. You can find my comments inline. On 31.07.2014 18:08, Andreas Färber wrote: > Adds initial support for the HP Chromebook 11. [snip] > + gpio-keys { > + compatible = "gpio-keys"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&power_key_irq>, <&lid_irq>; > + > + power { > + label = "Power"; > + gpios = <&gpx1 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + linux,code = ; I assume the key is debounced in hardware, so there is no need for debounce-interval here. Is this correct? > + gpio-key,wakeup; > + }; > + > + lid-switch { > + label = "Lid"; > + gpios = <&gpx3 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + linux,input-type = <5>; /* EV_SW */ > + linux,code = <0>; /* SW_LID */ > + debounce-interval = <1>; > + gpio-key,wakeup; > + }; > + }; > + > + usb3_vbus_reg: regulator-usb3 { > + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; > + regulator-name = "P5.0V_USB3CON"; > + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; > + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; > + gpio = <&gpe1 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + enable-active-high; > + }; > + > + usb@12110000 { Since this is a brand new dts file, it should use the reference based syntax, which would be something like &usbhost { ... }; below the / { ... }; block. > + samsung,vbus-gpio = <&gpx1 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + }; > + > + usb-hub { > + compatible = "smsc,usb3503a"; > + reset-gpios = <&hsic_reset>; Hmm, why a -gpios property points to a pinctrl node? Shouldn't there be a phandle to GPIO bank + GPIO specifier instead? > + }; > + > + fixed-rate-clocks { > + xxti { > + compatible = "samsung,clock-xxti"; > + clock-frequency = <24000000>; > + }; > + }; This is also referencing a node from higher level, so it should be done using a reference. > + > + hdmi { > + hpd-gpio = <&gpx3 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&hdmi_hpd_irq>; > + phy = <&hdmiphy>; > + ddc = <&i2c_2>; > + hdmi-en-supply = <&s5m_ldo8_reg>; > + vdd-supply = <&s5m_ldo8_reg>; > + vdd_osc-supply = <&s5m_ldo10_reg>; > + vdd_pll-supply = <&s5m_ldo8_reg>; > + }; Ditto. > + > + fimd@14400000 { > + status = "okay"; > + samsung,invert-vclk; > + }; Ditto. > + > + dp-controller@145B0000 { > + status = "okay"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <&dp_hpd>; > + samsung,color-space = <0>; > + samsung,dynamic-range = <0>; > + samsung,ycbcr-coeff = <0>; > + samsung,color-depth = <1>; > + samsung,link-rate = <0x0a>; > + samsung,lane-count = <1>; > + samsung,hpd-gpio = <&gpc3 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; > + }; Ditto. > +}; > + > +&dp_hpd { > + samsung,pins = "gpc3-0"; > + samsung,pin-function = <0>; > + samsung,pin-pud = <3>; > + samsung,pin-drv = <0>; > +}; Hmm, what node is this referencing? I believe this should rather reference the pin controller and add a new board-specific pinconf/pinmux group instead.... > + > +&i2c_0 { > + status = "okay"; > + samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>; > + samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <378000>; [snip] > +/* > + * Disabled pullups since external part has its own pullups and > + * double-pulling gets us out of spec in some cases. > + */ > +&i2c2_bus { > + samsung,pin-pud = <0>; > +}; OK, here overriding a generic pinconf group is justified and nicely explained by a comment. > + > +&i2c_2 { > + status = "okay"; > + samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>; > + samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <66000>; > + > + hdmiddc@50 { > + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-hdmiddc"; > + reg = <0x50>; > + }; I don't think this matches current Exynos HDMI bindings, which I believe have been changed to just take a phandle to i2c bus instead. > +}; > + > +&i2c_3 { > + status = "okay"; > + samsung,i2c-sda-delay = <100>; > + samsung,i2c-max-bus-freq = <66000>; > +}; [snip] > +&sd1_clk { > + samsung,pin-drv = <0>; > +}; > + > +&sd1_cmd { > + samsung,pin-pud = <3>; > + samsung,pin-drv = <0>; > +}; > + > +&sd1_cd { > + samsung,pin-drv = <0>; > +}; > + > +&sd1_bus4 { > + samsung,pin-drv = <0>; > +}; Here generic settings are being overridden, so it might be a good idea to explain why, like with i2c pull-up above. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/