Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751372AbaJAHnX (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:43:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:62668 "EHLO mail-ie0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751063AbaJAHnW (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 03:43:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1412086542-1662-1-git-send-email-pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com> References: <1412086542-1662-1-git-send-email-pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:43:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: remove remaining users of gpiochip_remove() retval From: Linus Walleij To: Pramod Gurav Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav wrote: > Some driver in gpio still check for return value from gpiochip_remove > Get rid of the check for return value. > > Cc: Linus Walleij > Cc: Alexandre Courbot > Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org > > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav This is already fixed in the GPIO tree, and in linux-next. I have got more patches like this from other people, and cannot quite understand what kind of tree you are actually looking at? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/