Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754018AbaJATDF (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:03:05 -0400 Received: from 80-229-23-162.plus.com ([80.229.23.162]:38891 "EHLO mail.einon.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751930AbaJATDE (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:03:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 20:02:59 +0100 From: Mark Einon To: Tobias Klauser Cc: Joe Perches , Mark Einon , davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] et131x: Add PCIe gigabit ethernet driver et131x to drivers/net Message-ID: <20141001190259.GA2697@msilap.einon.net> References: <1412112586-2194-1-git-send-email-mark.einon@gmail.com> <20141001124500.GH3279@distanz.ch> <1412171027.3247.6.camel@joe-AO725> <20141001141449.GI3279@distanz.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141001141449.GI3279@distanz.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:14:49PM +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote: > On 2014-10-01 at 15:43:47 +0200, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 14:45 +0200, Tobias Klauser wrote: > > > On 2014-09-30 at 23:29:46 +0200, Mark Einon wrote: > > > > This adds the ethernet driver for Agere et131x devices to > > > > drivers/net/ethernet. > > [] > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/agere/et131x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/agere/et131x.c > > [] > > > > + rc = pci_enable_device(pdev); > > > > + if (rc < 0) { > > > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pci_enable_device() failed\n"); > > > > + goto out; > > > > > > Nit: Just return rc here. > > > > I don't think it matters at all. > > Combined with my second remark this change makes the `out' label > unnecessary. If Mark decides to keep the goto here, at least the > position of the label should be changed to the end of the function, to > remain predictable and avoid jumping back. Hi Tobias, Thanks for the review. Yes, I think it is a bit nit-picking, and I'd prefer to have just one return in the function. I don't think replacing the return with a goto adds much and in the interests of keeping churn down, I won't be making the change unless it prevents the driver moving out of staging. Cheers, Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/