Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:28:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:28:04 -0500 Received: from pc1-cwma1-5-cust42.swan.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.120.42]:28585 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Dec 2002 12:28:03 -0500 Subject: RE: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? From: Alan Cox To: "Joseph D. Wagner" Cc: "'Shane Helms'" , "'Ed Vance'" , "'jeff millar'" , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <000901c29c5d$6d194760$2e833841@joe> References: <000901c29c5d$6d194760$2e833841@joe> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 05 Dec 2002 18:09:56 +0000 Message-Id: <1039111796.19636.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 866 Lines: 22 On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 12:54, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: > trying to advance new features. For example, the POSIX standard is the > reason we have the three-by-three secure permissions on files (three users: > owner, group, everyone; three permissions: read, write, execute) instead of > Access Control Lists (ACL's). POSIX allows ACLS and MAC. > I don't know of any mistakes per say, but if I had to do it over again, > there's about a thousands things I'd do differently (preference in design > choices, not mistakes) especially not to cling so religiously to POSIX > compliance. And then you'd have no applications. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/