From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@apm.com, jcm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/4] APM X-Gene PCIe host controller
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 14:20:49 +0200
Message-ID: <2135522.DVGa59N1mx@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-10-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20141001191403.GC22713@google.com>
References: <1411765707-28822-1-git-send-email-tinamdar@apm.com> <20141001191403.GC22713@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 01 October 2014 13:14:03 Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 02:08:23PM -0700, Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> > This patch adds support for AppliedMicro X-Gene PCIe host controller. The
> > driver is tested on X-Gene platform with different gen1/2/3 PCIe endpoint
> > cards.
> > 
> > X-Gene PCIe controller driver has depedency on the pcie arm64 arch support.
> > Liviu Dudau from ARM has sent a patch set for pcie arm64 arch support and
> > support for creating generic pcie bridge from device tree. Liviu's patches
> > are available here
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/23/852
> > 
> > If someone wishes to test PCIe on X-Gene with this patch set, above mentioned
> > patches from Liviu must be applied before the patches in this patch set. Also
> > please use latest xgene u-boot firmware.
> 
> I applied these on pci/host-xgene (based on pci/host-generic).  I hope to
> merge these for v3.18.  It'd be nice to have a device tree person like Arnd
> or Rob take a look at the arch/arm64/boot/dts/ bits.

Those changes should normally go through the arm-soc tree, but we
have not done that so far for arm64 stuff, so I'm not blaming anybody.

The dts changes all look good to me, and I think it's ok to have them
go through your tree this time.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

In the future, we should all have an eye on this more to ensure that
the .dts changes all go through arm-soc.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/