Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:12:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:12:34 -0500 Received: from gromco.com ([209.10.98.91]:11072 "HELO gromco.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:12:22 -0500 Message-ID: <39FF0A71.FE05FAEB@gromco.com> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 13:07:45 -0500 From: Vladislav Malyshkin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Samuelson , R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl, torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: test10-pre7 In-Reply-To: <39FEF039.69FAFDB2@gromco.com> <14846.63285.212616.574188@wire.cadcamlab.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Also, the function remove_duplicates can be written using make rules and functions. Using functions "foreach" "if" from make and comparison you can easily build a function remove_duplicates in make, no shell involved. so instead of $(sort) your will have $(remove_duplicates) written entirely in make. Vladislav Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Vladislav Malyshkin ] > > You can easily remove duplicates in object files without sorting. > > You can just use a shell written function. > > This is true. That was something I forgot to mention. I have looked > at that as well, and it strikes me as even more of a hack than the > solutions I mentioned: it is yet another external shell process for > each invocation of Rules.make (ie each directory). As I said before, > though, one man's hack is another man's clean design, so whatever. > > Your function is rather long; try this one instead (untested): > > remove_duplicates () { > str=''; > for i; do > case "$str " in *" $i "*) ;; *) str="$str $i" ;; esac > done > echo "$str" > } > > I still think anything outside the makefiles that's needed to organize > the build process is a hack. That includes scripts/pathdown.sh (yes, I > do have a scheme to get rid of it) and 2.2.18 scripts/kwhich (yes, I > did propose a working alternative). It doesn't include scripts/mkdep.c > (which must do a lot of work as efficiently as possible), > scripts/Configure et al (which are really standalone programs), or > scripts/split-include.c (which is really a continuation of Configure). > > Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/