Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751442AbaJCIHZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 04:07:25 -0400 Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:50689 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751074AbaJCIHR (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 04:07:17 -0400 Message-ID: <542E592E.2040308@collabora.co.uk> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 10:07:10 +0200 From: Javier Martinez Canillas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King - ARM Linux CC: Arnd Bergmann , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Olof Johansson , Stephen Rothwell , Kukjin Kim , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree References: <20141002113742.2b521495@canb.auug.org.au> <14357384.nIoLZkacVq@wuerfel> <542E4721.8040300@collabora.co.uk> <20141003075623.GU5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20141003075623.GU5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Russell, On 10/03/2014 09:56 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 08:50:09AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Hello Arnd, Stephen, >> >> I'm so sorry about the breakage, when I posted this patch I mentioned that >> it was meant for the 3.18-rc cycle once 3.18-rc1 was released [0]. Because >> it fixes a regression caused by a patch queued in the clock tree for 3.18. >> I should had been more explicit about the dependencies to avoid confusions. > > If a patch is known to cause a regression, it shouldn't be going in during > the merge window _or_ the fix patch should also go in during the merge > window via the same route to resolve the regression before it's noticable. > > Given the number of changes which go in during the merge window, waiting > for -rc to fix a known bug *before* the merge window is not on - it breaks > the ability to bisect during the period where bisect really is needed. > I'm not the author of the patch that caused the regression, I just was bitten by it and proposed a fix. So please don't kill the messenger :-) Sorry, I didn't know about this rule, otherwise I would had asked Mike to pick the fix instead. Or at least ask Kukjin to provide an immutable branch so Mike could merge it on his clock tree. Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/