Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753818AbaJCPHL (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:07:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.82.50]:36527 "EHLO mail-wg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753329AbaJCPHF (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Oct 2014 11:07:05 -0400 Message-ID: <542EBB93.108@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 17:06:59 +0200 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.0 To: Jason Cooper , Benoit Masson CC: Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Ezequiel Garcia , Thomas Petazzoni , Benoit Masson , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes References: <1411157684-6991-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <-7443282711873112734@unknownmsgid> <20141003141102.GJ3895@titan.lakedaemon.net> In-Reply-To: <20141003141102.GJ3895@titan.lakedaemon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/03/2014 04:11 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote: >>> Le 19 sept. 2014 ? 22:14, Sebastian Hesselbarth a ?crit : >>> this is a patch set preparing barebox support for ix4-300d. As usual, >>> I stumbled upon a few nice-to-haves before actually touching ix4-300d >>> dts. As it is a mach-mvebu thing, I just added the related mailing >>> lists instead of each of the DT maintainers. >>> >>> First 5 patches consolidate SoC-specific pinctrl nodes to one common >>> node in armada-xp.dtsi, compatible overwrites for each SoC, and node >>> alias usage for each board. Also, ge{0,1} pinctrl settings are moved >>> to the common node from one board specific node. >>> >>> Last 3 patches then use that ge{0,1} pinctrl settings on ix4-300d which >>> is vital for bootloader init. During exploration of ix4-300d, I also >>> found a i2c eeprom that has not been added to the dts, yet. Finally, >>> there is only one 74hc595 on ix4 mainboard while dts property is set >>> for two. >>> >>> I cannot recall in detail what is on that eeprom, but IIRC it is nothing >>> important. Some reg,addr pairs for some init stuff that should have >>> already been done by stock u-boot. Anyway, adding the node will do no >>> harm. >>> >>> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not in >>> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Benoit >>> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great. >> >> I'm not sure what to test since I only receive some patch from the >> series of 8. Should I get all 8 or only those you sent me. I'll be >> able to test during next week. > > Did you ever get a chance to test this series? Uhm, I never prepared a branch for Benoit to test. I have pushed the patches with Thomas Acked-by's and renamed eeprom node based on v3.17-rc1 to https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4 Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/